People have accused me of many things since they learnt that I refuse to unquestionably support the Palestinians. I have lost some of my blog so-called friends, and got a few nasty personal messages. It seems that most people seem not to be able to tell the difference between not agreeing with their opinion and being evil.
So for all those who already hate me regardless of what I have to say. Stop reading here. It will not change your minds. (I also have nothing to say for those who poison ponds to protest against hunters.)
For the others who may be a bit more curious, here are the five principles that guide me when dealing with complex human situations:
1. You can divide history to two periods, the history of the living or of the history of the dead. The vast majority does not care whether the history of the dead happened 3 generations or a thousand years ago. Why should they care? So my first principle is to treat all history of the dead equally. Either I think it’s relevant, or I ignore it.
2. You can’t change history, but you can easily manipulate it. So my second principle is to always assume that what I am led to believe is manipulated.
3. Most people become emotional first, and nothing can change their minds later. So my third principle is to always find the facts for myself before I get emotional about things I don’t know
4. In no conflict – personal business or political – defining someone as being bad while putting the other as good has ever made anything better. My fourth principle is to always try to see things from all viewpoints.
5. Doubt is the only way to keep ones mind open. I am more often wrong than right, Yet, I am more often right than many of those around me. So my fifth principle is to keep doubting everything.
I lost many so called friends following these principles. I still let them guide me.
evilhippy
Jesus tapdancing polterChrist, always getting into trouble, eh Ran?
Having not followed your Palestinian commentary, and being unaware of what's happening except a disinclination to support Palestine unconditionally, then all I can say is: why the hell would anyone want to support them unconditionally? They kill just like the rest of the groups involved in the Israel situation, and looking at history, very broadly, you'd think some of that Islamic hospitality and kindness preached from on high would extend to giving the most victimised group of people around a bit of a break.
Invasion, land theft - how the fuck can anyone claim to OWN land, anyway??? One of the most retarded ideas ever when taken too seriously.
I mean unfair to have your group shut into a smaller space, yes, but not as unfair as having your entire family group and most of your cultural peoples raped and slaughtered. Little perspective here, folks.
I'm totaly behind the idea that unconditional support is naive, dangerous, and only contributes to more pain and suffering. Why can't most people hold two or three overlapping concepts in their head at the same time??
Guess that's the same reason some can't distinguish between critical thought of a very suspect regime and something actually representative of that regime's alleged antithesis.
Sounds more and more like the driving forces of propaganda and mass decepetion the more I think about it!