by ranfuchs
@ 23/02/2008 - 15:15:44
Q: why do I always attract the available, but never the unavailable?
A: Because many of the unavailable, are more emotionally available than those who are available.
Archives
- July 2008 (2)
- June 2008 (10)
- May 2008 (12)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (11)
- February 2008 (19)
- January 2008 (23)
- December 2007 (20)
- November 2007 (9)
- October 2007 (7)
- more...
Friends (85)
Search
Subscribe by email
You can receive the posts of this weblog by email.
Last posts
Last comments
- ranfuchs on: A question about failure
- kaimi0achava on: A question about failure
- jackfrost on: A question about failure
- ranfuchs on: the good old days
- ranfuchs on: I wish I were ....
- ranfuchs on: A question about failure
- ranfuchs on: A question about failure
- kiki2u on: the good old days
- kiki2u on: I wish I were ....
- rubychoo on: A question about failure
- Show more
Why?
Trackback address for this post:
Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments
 | funkdifino pro 23/02/08 @ 22:49 |
Not wanting to attract anyone usually does the opposite n'est pas?
 | ranfuchs [Member] 23/02/08 @ 22:56 |
or else?
I reckon that's the best way to attract people sexually, show no interest and therefor no neediness.
With friends of course it's best to be friendly. But make sure those people are friendly enough to be worthy of your time in doing so.
| ranfuchs [Member] 24/02/08 @ 21:06 |
funny that. The less interested you are, the more sexy people find you. Some divine joke I think.
 | CassandraofTroy [Member] 26/02/08 @ 10:17 |
My last comment made no sense. sorry.
A makes perfect sense, but not as a reply to Q.
I think Q is the problem.
Or maybe I'll just shut up.
| CassandraofTroy [Member] 26/02/08 @ 08:38 |
The question is a tautology.
But the answer makes no sense.
Elucidate.
 | technomist [Member] 29/02/08 @ 12:14 |
Wasn't Elucidate an ancient Trojan philosopher? For the question to be a tautology, does it matter what kind of attraction takes place? Could the attentions being attracted by unwelcome, for instance, or aggressive?
| CassandraofTroy [Member] 29/02/08 @ 20:27 |
Know him well - I think he was some kind of uncle 
Those who are being attracted are available to attraction - by definition. Hence, tautological.
Unwelcomeness is irrelevant (that is a characteristic of the attractor, not attractee).
Aggression is often an unmistakable indicator of suppressed/denied attraction, IMHO.
But hey, whadduino??
| ranfuchs [Member] 01/03/08 @ 02:57 |
a second drink comes at this point
 | husbandorcat [Member] 01/03/08 @ 03:04 |
Only second?
| ranfuchs [Member] 01/03/08 @ 03:37 |
yes. I am pretty sober tonight 
 | Melinda_blog [Member] 01/03/08 @ 03:39 |
Glad to hear it.
You shouldn't drink alone.
I'll go and get one too.
| ranfuchs [Member] 01/03/08 @ 02:53 |
Too difficult questions. Scatching my head. I think I need a drink
 | aquamud [Member] 26/02/08 @ 20:50 |
it's all out there isn't it? it's all available in some way or another... the rest is history
Leave a comment :
Recent Posts
-
A question about failure
on 05/07/2008 -
Lessons of life (2)
on 05/07/2008 -
I wish I were ....
on 28/06/2008 -
New type of BCUK spam
on 24/06/2008 -
the good old days
on 21/06/2008 -
Let's get serious
on 21/06/2008 -
Who is smarter
on 21/06/2008 -
Not for internal use
on 21/06/2008 -
Quotations from the honest guru
on 21/06/2008 -
All you needed to know about lawyers
on 15/06/2008
23/02/08 @ 16:57